Posts filed under 'inrich consulting'

VoIP Tender Toolkit - Part 1: Preparation

This is the first installment in the “VoIP Tender Toolkit” series. I hope the complete series will provide everything you need to prepare, issue and evaluate a 500 - 5,000 seat VoIP Tender. Template documents will be provided where helpful. This series is based on actual experience and incorporates my lessons learnt over the years. In this first part I will run through the considerations before you start; defining business objectives, activities and expected timelines, budgeting, and resources required.
 
Business Objectives
Start the entire VoIP tender process by defining your business objectives. Too often have I seen people forget that technology is a business enabler and that business objectives provide the focus of a tender not technical objectives. Business objectives provide the reference point to make decisions towards getting the best value for money tender result, this may not necessarily be the best value for money technical result! (indeed it may not even result in a VoIP solution!).  In my experience tenders commenced with a technical objective too often result in a poor business result and are consequently deemed a failure.
 
The following table provides some common business objectives and the potential VoIP tender results. Hopefully this highlights the reason for stating business objectives rather than technical objectives.
 
Example Business Objectives
Potential Tender Results
Provide telephony to a new office site
Installation of a PABX, extension of services from an existing PABX or installation of hosted telephony service.
Lower telephony costs
Renegotiation of call rates, renegotiation of maintenance contracts, installation of lower cost telephony solutions (PABX, extended services or hosted services) or outsource of telephony support
Increase business efficiency
Integration of business software and telephony services (e.g. in call centre environments), solutions to save telephony administration time or new solutions to support under served business functions (e.g. home or mobile workers)
 
Activities and timelines
The activities and related timelines for preparing and releasing a VoIP tender are presented in the following table. In general, the timelines are the same for any size company over 500 ends. Larger or more complex requirements need more work but usually have more people involved. The first step “Preparation” is the focus of this post, and the remaining steps except “await supplier responses”! will be the focus of the next parts in this series.
 
Step
Timeline
Preparation Month 1
Business requirements gathering Month 1
User requirements gathering Month 2
Technical requirements gathering Month 2
Technical environment survey Month 2
Tender strategy development Month 3
Tender development and release Month 3
Await supplier responses Month 4
Tender evaluation Month 5
Contract negotiation Month 6

Yes, the above table provides an elapsed estimate of 6 months! I’ve seen slightly quicker, but never less than 5 months. In an organisation larger than 500 people it just is not possible to get agreement and approvals any faster. It can be up to 9 months if a second stage of tendering is completed. Organisations who try to complete a tender in less time often miss key detail, make mistakes, and end up regretting it.

Budget
Too many organisations spend loads of money on running a tender process only to find they can’t afford any of the resulting proposals. Having a budget to produce the tender will manage short term cost expectations and having an idea on the resulting proposal cost range will manage the medium to long term cost expectations.

Item
Budget range
Tender process  ± 50%
Internal labour (see next section for details) 29 weeks of effort
Consultant labour 5 weeks of effort
Tender result  ± 30%
“no frills” telephony
around £12
(per end per month over 5 years + call costs)
“advanced” telephony
extra £5 for call centre functions
extra £5 for voice recording
(per end per month over 5 years + call costs)
Legacy or existing system integration 10% of the overall solution otherwise not worthwhile
 
Please note I have provided a cost per end point per month over 60 months as this is a reasonable life span of a telephony solution. The estimates include ongoing maintenance costs but do not include call charges. VAT in addition. The budget accuracy of 30% for the tender result and 50% of the labour resources acknowledges differences in solutions and deal size (labour varies significantly more). Vendor finance options will only effect cash flow but not the total cost (there’s no such thing as a free lunch!). The number of sites in a solution wont have a significant effect on the budget accuracy as long as each site has at least 100 users.
 
So as an example using the above table, a 500 user solution including 50 call centre seats including voice recording, will cost over 5 years about £270,000 to £500,000 + call costs + internal and consultant labour + integration costs (500 “no frills” × £12 × 60 months + 50 “advanced” × (£5 call centre + £5 voice recording) × 60 months = £390,000, 70% = £273,000, 130% = £507,000).
 
Resources required
The following table provides a breakdown of the labour estimate in the previous section. As usual the estimate is a guide and will hopefully be useful in preparing your own estimates.
 
Role
Activities
Weeks effort  ± 50%
Project sponsor
(accountable for the tender outcome)
Essential input to Preparation stage, Tender Strategy Development Stage and signoff and steering for key decisions. 3
Project manager
Manage and co-ordinate activities and resources from beginning to end. 16
IT resources
Key input to technical requirements gathering, technical environment survey and tender evaluation stages. 3
Business representative resources
Key input to business requirements gathering and tender evaluation stage. 3
Procurement resources (may include legal and finance representation)
Key input to tender development and release, tender evaluation and contract negotiation. 4
  Total 29
 
Consultant time was estimated at 5 weeks, this covers assistance across all stages of the process, but in particular insight and experience in the tender development and release, the subsequent evaluation and contract negotiation. Unless your company has specific VoIP tender experience I would not recommend excluding this resource as the benefit will far outweigh the cost when compared to the overall solution budget.
 

Summary
Successful preparation for a VoIP tender will mean your business objectives have been clearly defined, a schedule defining tasks, timelines and resources will have been developed and expectations on the approximate financial values resulting from the tender will have been managed with your project sponsor.

Part 2 in this series will cover business, user and technical requirements gathering.

Add comment February 23rd, 2009

OCS 5 day hosted trial - no fuss opportunity to learn

I’ve just completed the 5 day OCS hosted trial and am pleased to report it provided an insight that I would recommend to anyone interested in OCS. The online signup process was followed by an email providing logon details, voicemail box numbers and a download link for the desktop Office Communicator client. The daily email outlining key features was clear and consise. Features covered by the trial include:

  • Instant Messaging & Presence using the Office Communicator desktop client
  • Email & Unified Messaging using Outlook Web Access including voice command access to your inbox and playback of email messages (Outlook Voice Access)
  • Peer-to-Peer Voice & Video using the Office Communicator client
  • Desktop Sharing
  • Web-based IM, Email, Presence & Desktop Sharing using Office Communicator Web Access (this uses a web based client for access rather than a downloadable desktop client… key for workers using home or public computers)

Large enterprises considering evaluating OCS will get evaluation trials from their suppliers quite easily, however if you just want a no fuss trial to understand what OCS is about then the hosted offer will serve you nicely. If you have more time to commit you can also download 180 day trials that you host on your own hardware.

Add comment February 10th, 2009

How significant are ShoreTel’s claims about the ‘hard’ benefits of its UC solution?

One of the biggest criticisms leveled at UC provider sales pitches is their focus on ‘soft’ benefits, such as time saved for the average office worker and increased productivity. Of course, what most organisations need in order justify a UC purchase decision is reliable evidence of ‘hard’ benefits such as cost reduction and accelerated time to market. ShoreTel’s promotion of the energy efficiency of its solution provides an interesting example of a UC provider trying to address that need.

ShoreTel’s claims are based on a report it commissioned from the Tolly group to investigate the power consumption of its IP switches and IP phones relative to those from other suppliers. These tests were then used as the basis for projections of the typical energy consumption of ShoreTel’s UC solution in various deployment scenarios. These projections estimate that a ShoreTel UC system on a network made up of 350 users at a main site and 19 branch offices would use 45% less power than Cisco’s UC offering. At a single site with 65 users, the saving would be 44%, and that deployment at a main site with 1500 users plus one regional and one branch office site would produce savings of 37%.

On the one hand, it’s shame that the figures that ShoreTel is quoting here are only projections - many customers will only be convinced if they see numbers that originate from real world deployment. On the other, ShoreTel should be commended for having enough faith in its own technology to risk a severe loss of credibility if customers make a purchase on the strength of these energy saving projections, and then fail to achieve a comparable result in the field.

Add comment November 2nd, 2008

What do Cisco’s recent acquisitions mean for the UC market?

Cisco’s acquisition of PostPath, a collaboration server vendor, and Jabber, an IM and presence software developer, are important from a number of perspectives.

Firstly, they are small but significant steps in Cisco’s evolution from hardware vendor to software and services provider. They also augment Cisco’s UC offering with improved e-mail, calendaring, IM and presence functionality. This will enable it to compete more directly with Microsoft for ownership of the
corporate desktop communications environment. However, these acquisitions also better enable Cisco to work with customers existing infrastructure. And this will make the transition to UC a lot less daunting for many IT decision-makers.

The fact is that despite all the hype about hosted UC, many companies aren’t ready to ditch their existing infrastructure and the familiarity of a CPE and Microsoft Exchange-based communications system - at least not now, and not on an organisation-wide basis. Deploying UC on a smaller scale to test its usefulness for specific sites or departments makes more sense to most companies at this stage in the development of the market. And that isn’t an ideal model for providers looking to supply a hosted UC solution. Cisco’s acquisitions help it to address this dilemma by enabling it to offer its customers CPEbased integration with Microsoft Exchange and extended UC functionality in the short term, and a feature-rich hosted alternative to Microsoft Office Communications Server in the longer term.

As a result, Cisco gains the flexibility to adapt its offering to customers’ state of readiness for UC adoption. And this increases its credibility with customers as it tries to gain similar levels of acceptance in the desktop communications space as it has in the network environment.

Of course, this is also good news for enterprises, who get more choice when it comes to deciding on a UC implementation strategy. It also helps them delay the PBX replacement discussion, a big barrier to UC adoption. Instead, they now have the option to implement a Cisco solution that can be used with existing CPE now, and migrate to a network-hosted solution when they are ready.

Greater service flexibility and increased customer choice should also contribute to the development of the wider UC market by stimulating overall demand and accelerating the real-world delivery of UC benefits both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’.

Add comment November 2nd, 2008

Extending Microsoft Office Communicator features to mobile devices

office-communicator-mobile-image.PNGFor organisations planning to deploy Microsoft Office Communicator a consideration worth evaluating is the mobile device integration options.

Integration with Office Communicator (well actually Office Communications Server or OCS) extends features such as presence to mobile devices so users can be aware of the availability of PC based Office Communicator users or other OCS integrated mobile users. Other features include extending a common address book and Instant Messaging. These features enhance worker productivity by aiding efficient communications.

The OCS client for Windows Mobile is called Microsoft Office Communicator Mobile (see image). For Symbian based devices a third party application developed by WebMessenger is available (also works on Microsoft Mobile and Blackberry). For enterprises with a Blackberry Enterprise Server a RIM solution is available to extend services to Blackberrys.

To leverage the most out of your Office Communications Server investment (or any other desktop messaging software) a detailed look at the options available for extending functions to mobile devices is definitely worthwhile. Conversely a comprehensive mobile device evaluation should include desktop messaging integration as a criteria for consideration.

Add comment October 2nd, 2008

Android… a potential enterprise mobile platform… in time

In case you missed it the Android mobile operating system, which an alliance of 30 companies including Google helped develop, has been released.

Unlike the iPhone, Android being an operating system, is expected to be released on multiple handsets much like Windows Mobile. T-Mobile has opted for a HTC handset to be the first to release an Android based phone called the G1.

See the below video from Google President Sergey Brin stepping through the Android operating system.

Needless to say Android is tightly integrated with applications such as Google Maps and GMail with specific features such as touch screen dependent on the device the operating system is supplied with. In addition however Google is actively encouraging third party developed applications by providing a $10 million incentive program!

While the Android does not yet include support for any enterprise Push Email services no doubt just like the iPhone it will be a matter of time before IT Managers need to include Android in their consideration of mobile operating sytems along with RIM, Windows Mobile, and Symbian.

1 comment October 1st, 2008


Subscribe

Recent Posts